-----------------------------
Published on October 14, 2005 By ----- In Misc
It seems that there is a blogger here who likes to satire me. Make me look even stupider. And, a few here have gone on with it. Well, I have to say one thing... Mr. "just john", if you have something against me, don't hide behind your blog. Come out and say it. Whatever it is you think of me. Come here, tell me. Deal with it. Okay? I don't particularly care for you past few blogs concerning me. Talk with me about. Let’s act like adults.

Well, are you willing? Or will you hide?

--Lucas

Comments (Page 1)
2 Pages1 2 
on Oct 14, 2005
D'oh! I just took a look at his profile... Well, guess i'll just have to wait...until i am un-grounded.

Thanks for letting me know...
on Oct 14, 2005
lol, I forgot you were grounded too.


, yep, guess we'll have to fight from our rooms, start yelling and stuff...
on Oct 15, 2005
'don't hide behind your blog.'
That's pretty rich, coming from someone who changes his blog name more often than many people change their underwear!
on Oct 15, 2005
1) i dont change my undies very often; and

2) from a postmodern perspective, every moment that passes creates a new contextual identity for everyone. literally you are not the same person who read this sentence. i would expect that by the time elindelwolf gets around to reading this, many identities will have come and gone.

to restate: changing identities is more fundamental than changing underwear.

thank you for your time.

tbt
on Oct 15, 2005
'to restate: changing identities is more fundamental than changing underwear.'

Point taken. 'elindelwolf' has a history of doing more than just creative contextualising though; e.g. he has previously claimed bogus qualifications for himself in order to have other bloggers take him more seriously than they do. To me, this is less a postmodern dynamic identity than out-and-out telling porkies. And for someone with that self-confessed record to accuse another blogger of 'hiding' behing his blog ... well, you catch my drift.
on Oct 15, 2005
Point taken. 'elindelwolf' has a history of doing more than just creative contextualising though; e.g. he has previously claimed bogus qualifications for himself in order to have other bloggers take him more seriously than they do.


--And you dig up the past why?

And for someone with that self-confessed record to accuse another blogger of 'hiding' behing his blog ... well, you catch my drift


--I'm talking about hiding behind it, instead of coming out and saying he had a problem with me. This has *nothing* to do with the past...
on Oct 16, 2005
'--And you dig up the past why?'
1) Because you're STILL attempting to deny it, not least by constantly changing your blog name.
2) Because those who refuse to acknowledge history have a habit of turning into the likes of Pol Pot.
3) It goes to character, m'lud.
on Oct 16, 2005
) Because you're STILL attempting to deny it, not least by constantly changing your blog name.


--It wasn't denying it. I chose it cause i wanted the username, everyone STILL knows who i am. Its not hard to miss me. (By my writing style, etc...)

2) Because those who refuse to acknowledge history have a habit of turning into the likes of Pol Pot.


-I'm not refusing to acknowledge it. I'm sticking it in my pocket and moving on. I realized i screwed up in the past, but, i ma not going to let it haunt me. I will remember it, as a reminder that i won't go that way again. But, i need to move on. I see others still going on and on about it (just johns satire...for example). I just go "geez people, lets move on, there are more important things than satiring me..."... ya know?

3) It goes to character, m'lud.


-Perhaps....

-The bolded text is my main point. Let the dead dogs die. Don't forget, or you may repeat things over. But, learn from it, and i have. I'm getting to the point that, if others don't understand that, and keep referencing that, are just not welcome on my blog. I'm moving on...

on Oct 16, 2005
He's grounded, Lucas.


Now that's taking an impersonation to the extremes...
on Oct 17, 2005
'Let the dead dogs die'
Er, you can't - they're already dead. I think you mean 'Let sleeping dogs lie'.
on Oct 17, 2005
'Let the dead dogs die'Er, you can't - they're already dead. I think you mean 'Let sleeping dogs lie'.


--Its an old term....
on Oct 17, 2005
lmao... are you still here? If I were you I'd change my name once a week, too.
on Oct 17, 2005
geeeze can we all just get off lucas case for awhile?
on Oct 17, 2005
lmao... are you still here? If I were you I'd change my name once a week, too.


Yep, oooh, the horror!

geeeze can we all just get off lucas case for awhile?


N'ah, at times some people need a verbal punching bag... (Tag, yer it!)

Thanks for trying...MM Right...Anyway...
on Oct 17, 2005
"geeeze can we all just get off lucas case for awhile?"


Wouldn't have noticed him if he hadn't been in the midst of another drama queen thread, with no purpose other than to mix-it-up with some other blogger.

It didn't appear to be copy/pasted from some cheatonyourtermpaper.com site, so I had no reason to think this was Lucas, anyway. I didn't even know this was him until I saw the sig.
2 Pages1 2