-----------------------------
Published on June 24, 2005 By ----- In US Domestic
I receive emails from both the Democrat and Republican Parties, as i agree with certain things on either side... and i recently received this email:


Dear Lucas,

Just hours after learning about an outrageous speech delivered by Karl Rove, President Bush's most senior advisor, I went to the Senate floor -- and I spoke from my heart. I want to share those words with you -- not as a Democrat or Republican, not as a liberal or conservative -- but as an American.

I've attached part of my speech to the end of this email. But, before you read what I said, look again at what Karl Rove said:

(P)erhaps the most important difference between conservatives and liberals can be found in the area of national security. Conservatives saw the savagery of 9/11 and the attacks and prepared for war; liberals saw the savagery of the 9/11 attacks and wanted to prepare indictments and offer therapy and understanding for our attackers.
I hope you will join me right now in signing an open letter to the President urging him to thoroughly reject Karl Rove's purposeful attack on the patriotism of those who dare ask the tough questions that best protect American troops. Sign our open letter to President Bush now:

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/rove.php

This isn't the first time that Karl Rove and other White House officials have sought to divide America in ways that make it harder to keep our country safe and our democracy strong. But, it should be the last. That's why I ended my speech with a call on President Bush to fire Karl Rove. It is the only way the President can make it clear that he rejects Rove's effort to distort one of the most unified and patriotic moments in American history into a cheap, divisive, political applause line.

That, of course, is what is most outrageous about Karl Rove's claim that President Bush's political opponents offered "therapy and understanding for our attackers." It isn't true. In the days after 9/11, there were no Democrats, no Republicans. We were all Americans, standing together. President Bush acknowledged that unity in a clear and compelling way at the time.

Now, Karl Rove is purposely twisting those days of unity in order to divide us for political gain. I hope you will act right now to join a growing chorus of Americans calling on the President to fire Karl Rove.

http://www.johnkerry.com/petition/rove.php

Please act right now. Sign our open letter to the President and pass it on to others. All Americans have to speak with one powerful voice in response to this outrage. I will continue speaking out and I know I can count on you to stand with me.

Sincerely,

John Kerry



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Make America Safe, Not Divided
Excerpts of remarks by Senator John Kerry on the Senate floor on Thursday, June 23.


"None of us here will ever forget the hours after September 11... and the remarkable response of the American people as we came together as one to answer the attack on our homeland.... t brought out the best of all of us in America.

That spirit of our country should never be reduced to a cheap, divisive political applause line from anyone who speaks for the President of the United States.

I am proud, as my colleagues on this side are, that after September 11, all of the people of this country rallied to President Bush's call for unity to meet the danger. There were no Democrats, there were no Republicans, there were only Americans. That is why it is really hard to believe that last night in New York... the most senior adviser to the President of the United States [was] purposely twisting those days of unity in order to divide us for political gain.

Rather than focusing attention on Osama bin Laden and finding him or rather than focusing attention on just smashing al-Qaida and uniting our effort, as we have been, he is, instead, challenging the patriotism of every American who is every bit as committed to fighting terror as is he.

Just days after 9/11, the Senate voted 98 to nothing, and the House voted 420 to 1, to authorize President Bush to use all necessary and appropriate force against terror. And after the bipartisan vote, President Bush said: "I'm gratified that the Congress has united so powerfully by taking this action. It sends a clear message. Our people are together and we will prevail."

That is not the message that was sent by Karl Rove in New York City last night. Last night, he said: "No more needs to be said about" their "motives."

I think a lot more needs to be said about Karl Rove's motives because they are not the people's motives... They are not the motives of a nation that found unity in that critical moment--Democrat and Republican alike, all of us as Americans.

If the President really believes his own words, if those words have meaning, he should at the very least expect a public apology from Karl Rove. And frankly, he ought to fire him. If the President of the United States knows the meaning of those words, then he ought to listen to the plea of Kristen Breitweiser, who lost her husband when the Twin Towers came crashing down. She said: "If you are going to use 9/11, use it to make this nation safer than it was on 9/11."

Karl Rove doesn't owe me an apology and he doesn't owe Democrats an apology. He owes the country an apology. He owes Kristen Breitweiser and a lot of people like her, those families, an apology. He owes an apology to every one of those families who paid the ultimate price on 9/11 and expect their government to be doing all possible to keep the unity of their country and to fight an effective war on terror.

The fact is, millions of Americans...are asking Washington for honesty, for results, and for leadership--not for political division. Before Karl Rove delivers another political assault, he ought to stop and think about those families and the unity of 9/11.



----I really don't get all of the fuss about it... "

Comments
on Jun 24, 2005
I don't think it can be disputed that Liberals tend to be more self-condemning of the US and more apt to "see other sides of the issue". In that way Rove was dead-on.

People talk about Halliburton, and I have always said I would prefer to see a company make money from the downfall of Saddam Hussein, than a company like TotalFinaElf that was willing to enrich itself through his power.

In that same way, if the Bush administration has used terrorism as a tool to achieve political currency to fight for our interests, I can stomach that. Conversely, Senate and other Liberals have used this issue for US self-recrimination, to place political blame, and to sit back and critique the response while offering few alternatives if any.

So, at least the Conservative excesses in this case work for us, whereas the Liberal excesses weaken our resolve. I can live with well-intentioned oversight much more than backhoanded oversight.
on Jun 24, 2005
I don't think it can be disputed that Liberals tend to be more self-condemning of the US and more apt to "see other sides of the issue". In that way Rove was dead-on.


--Actually, if COL, Dabe,etc... post on this, it'll most likely be debated...
on Jun 25, 2005
I don't think it can be disputed that Liberals tend to be more self-condemning of the US and more apt to "see other sides of the issue".


I absolutely agree with this, although I don't think it's always a bad thing.
on Jun 25, 2005
"I absolutely agree with this, although I don't think it's always a bad thing."


I don't either. With some issues you just can't, though. It's like all the 'blame the victims' thing lately. You can't worry about how you can provoke someone into doing unspeakable acts. If you do, you make them less unspeakable, and accept part of the blame.
on Jun 25, 2005
So long as we, the American people, put up with this two party system and don't look for, or insist on other voices,in fact breaking the controlling RNC/ DNC, this country will remain a fifty fifty country and the politicans will continue to snicker behind their hands
at how they have total control of the people with the old saying that works so well; "DIVIDE AND CONQUER"the most concerning is that this makes the country easy to push into a differant system of control; I.E; socialism.
After the last Supreme Court Ruling, it gives one reason to wonder if maybe were not closer than we think.
on Jun 25, 2005

To respond to the question. NOthing. But after gettting beaten for the Dean, Durbin and Biden stuff. they had to nit pick just to divert attention from their own refusal to distance themselves from the whackos in their party.

Let me put it this way.  The row about Rove is just re-arranging deck chairs on the titanic.  Their words speak for themselves and trying to make out that the republicans are doing the same only works on the weak minded.  The rest understand the difference between a democrat and liberal.

And the weak minded is not the target audience of the republicans as they are the core of the democrats.