-----------------------------
Published on January 5, 2006 By ----- In International
With the recent news about Israels PM Ariel Sharon being hospitalized with yet another stroke, this time however, there is a slim chance he will survive. I offer them (the family, nation,etc...) my best regards and hope he does survive.

Secondly, I heard about who would replace him and am pleased. I've supported the idea of giving land back to the palestinians in the exchange for peace. (Or at least great attempts for it)

-EW


Doctors Doubt Full Recovery for Sharon

AP Medical Writers

Doctors said Wednesday that the chances of Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon making a full recovery from the massive stroke he suffered are slim.

The 77-year-old leader suffered a cerebral hemorrhage - bleeding in his brain - while en route to an Israeli hospital to have a hole in his heart fixed.

``It's among the most dangerous of all types of strokes,'' with half of victims dying within a month, said Dr. Robert A. Felberg, a neurologist who directs the stroke program at Ochsner Clinic in New Orleans.

Doctors rushed Sharon into surgery, which could be a good or a bad sign, depending on the extent, location and duration of the bleeding, said Dr. Larry Goldstein, director of Duke University's stroke program.

``Bleeding in some areas of the brain, if it's caught early enough, you can actually have not a bad outcome,'' he said.

If it occurs around the brain or in a back area known as the cerebellum, it can be drained more easily, often through a hole in the skull. Bleeding deep inside the brain can require opening the skull to operate, he said.

But in general, such strokes have a poor prognosis, Goldstein said.

The U.S. doctors have not examined Sharon but are experts in the field.

Sharon's scheduled heart procedure was intended to prevent a repeat of the mini-stroke he suffered last month, which doctors said was caused by a blood clot. The hole, a birth defect, was discovered afterward.

The prime minister has been taking blood thinners since then to prevent another clot, but such drugs also raise the risk of hemorrhages. These account for only about 10 percent of strokes. Other possible causes are ruptured blood vessels, an aneurysm, or bulge in a vessel wall that bursts, or even chronic high blood pressure.

Blood thinners may not have caused the latest stroke but could have made the bleeding worse and may account for its severity, said Dr. Philip Steig, chair of neurosurgery at Weill-Cornell Medical Center in New York.

Steig said doctors would likely try to treat the stroke by drilling a hole in Sharon's skull to remove the blood, which will have formed a blood clot. It is important to remove the blood because the bleeding creates pressure on the brain, enclosed in the skull, causing damage that may be irreversible.

It's possible that doctors may leave his skull open to give the brain space to swell.

``His prognosis is not good,'' Steig said. ``The damage may be too severe to recover from. It will depend on how severe the bleeding was and how long the pressure in his skull has been elevated.

``The fact that he's on a respirator means it's extremely serious. The likelihood that he is going to make a normal recovery is extremely slim. The death rate from this kind of thing is high.''



Comments
on Jan 05, 2006
'I've supported the idea of giving land back to the palestinians in the exchange for peace. (Or at least great attempts for it) '
Hmm, so you accept the concept of giving land BACK to the Palestinians, Lucas. Does that mean you acknowledge that it was taken from them in the first place? And if so, why should this be considered an exchange, rather than the correction of a past wrong?
on Jan 05, 2006
'... one can only pray that his successor is a tad less bloodthirsty.'
Couldn't agree more, LW.
on Jan 05, 2006
Well, I know one Israeli that is not sorry to see Sharon step down.  I doubt he can continue given the doctor's prognosis.
on Jan 05, 2006
Ariel Sharon is a good, honorable man and everyone should be hoping for his full recovery. He was blamed (by the uninformed, misinformed, and liars) for the Sabra massacre, but these critics never mention the fact that it was the Lebanese Christians who actually committed the massacre. He ordered the pullout of the Gaza Strip, granting limited autonomy to the Palestinians, and this has resulted in the escalation of terrorist attacks by Palestinian militants. Only time will tell if the pullout was the right move, though. It's ironic how the most vocal critics of Israel actually stepped up their rhetoric after the pullout. This demonstrates that their criticisms are rooted in antisemitism or anit-Israel sentiment, rather than actual empathy for the Palestinians.
on Jan 05, 2006
Hmm, so you accept the concept of giving land BACK to the Palestinians, Lucas. Does that mean you acknowledge that it was taken from them in the first place? And if so, why should this be considered an exchange, rather than the correction of a past wrong?


Yes, I admit that when the nation was created, that the owners at the time had land taken from them. Do i believe that israeli's lived on the same land years before, yes.

Well, I know one Israeli that is not sorry to see Sharon step down.


Mano by any chance?



I would have mentioned it, its no secret you know, but I didnt want to overtax Lucas's brain with details.



That remark wasn't needed. I am *not* stupid.
on Jan 05, 2006
For that matter FC. It wasn't the *Israeli's* that created the israeli state. Unless history is mistaken, it was Truman who led the way (pretty much considering the reply to his choice) by himself, George marshal was furious, the american ambassador walked out of the UN when truman declared his intention. The Israeli's are the peoples "un wanted" people... At least history seems to show vast opposition at one time or another.

on Jan 05, 2006
Something that came to mind was (after i googled those words) is that, even though you may serve in an administration, that *does not* mean that you support its actions, and for that matter... You may support certain actions, that then evolve into...lets say, massacre. Just a thought...
on Jan 05, 2006

Ariel Sharon is a good, honorable man and everyone should be hoping for his full recovery.

You are an enigma!  WHile I do tend to agree with you, others I respect do not.  And they are closer to the truth.  I will say he did what he had to do when he had to do it.  But I am far from knowledgeable on all his actions.

I will leave it at that.

on Jan 05, 2006
Something else: Are we to judge others by their past, or by what they do today through what they have learned from their past?
on Jan 05, 2006
Something that came to mind was (after i googled those words) is that, even though you may serve in an administration, that *does not* mean that you support its actions, and for that matter... You may support certain actions, that then evolve into...lets say, massacre. Just a thought...


May I kindly suggest googling those words again...if this is what you came up with, you were lead to the wrong sites. Sharon wasn't taking orders--he was giving them.

Something else: Are we to judge others by their past, or by what they do today through what they have learned from their past?

If Hitler were still alive today, you can be damn sure I'd judge him by his past. bin Laden as well. Some people commit acts that are so horrific that they will not be forgotten/forgiven while on this earth.
on Jan 05, 2006
If Hitler were still alive today, you can be damn sure I'd judge him by his past. bin Laden as well. Some people commit acts that are so horrific that they will not be forgotten/forgiven while on this earth.


True...Hitler and Stailn, and bin laden....are exceptions. Some people are...some are not. But still...


May I kindly suggest googling those words again...if this is what you came up with, you were lead to the wrong sites. Sharon wasn't taking orders--he was giving them.


From what i read, he seemed to not only be the one leading the charge...but...

on Jan 06, 2006
But...

As is any politician or figure head, their past is still open to interpretation of the facts. I feel he wasn't the only perpertrator, does that make him any worse, or better? No. I feel he has learned from his past, maybe not all of what he could.

on Jan 06, 2006
Anyone who doesnt learn from their past is an imbecile, and this man is no imbecile. He is a sly and crafty butcher, none have escaped his betrayals and hypocrisy, not even his own people, and if it makes you happy to pray for his recovery, suit yourself.


I have hope that he has.

Two things...

1) Do you honestly think, that anyone else would've made as much progress? With or without pressure...

2) We all have past incidents that we'd rather sweep under the rug, you...me...everyone.
on Jan 09, 2006
*whistles* Little Whip? How come you haven't replied to my two small points?